|
The Centre
de Recherche et d’Études sur les Pays d’Afrique
Orientale (CREPAO), attached to Pau
University (UPPA), in partnership with IFRA and l’Inter-university
Council of East Africa, organized a seminar titled “University
and scholars after a crisis in Eastern and Central African countries",
in Kampala in June 2007.
Presentation and research programme
This seminar lies within a wider academic exchange and North-South
solidarity programme, which brings together the French team and
various African scholars trained at Pau University. This programme
ended, in September 2006, with a seminar on ‘classical functions
and new position and attributions of scholars, comparative approach
of experiences and individual strategies’. Its major theme
dealt with “University and scholars after a crisis”;
with studies relating to surveys on private and public Universities
in the Great Lakes Regions of East Africa.
In the methodology, a network of national or expatriate scholars,
specialized in social sciences and humanities, who have worked in
the Great Lakes region were asked to respond to questionnaires.
The approach took place in three events. First the seminar, held
in Pau in September 2006, established the problems and determined
a number of new questions. The second seminar held in Kampala clarified
reflections and expanded the issue by proposing opening up East
African universities. The final event will be a conference during
which conclusions and recommendations will be made.
The questions that were dealt with in September 2006 were on the
‘classical functions and new position and attributions of
scholars, comparative approach of experiences and individual strategies’.
In June 2007, the work begun in Pau was continued, focusing on ‘classical
functions and the new position and attributions of scholars, comparative
approach of experiences and collective and individual strategies’.
The program will close in 2008 with a conference in Bujumbura.
The first meeting examined examples, monographs, biographies, typologies
of situations and problems that researchers and teachers in universities
encounter. The second meeting intends to complete the state of research
extending the work and inventories that are currently being pursued
on universities, inter-universities cooperation, reforms and orientations
experienced, the potential public policies or those being implemented.
The contribution of Ugandan scholars that have in the past dealt
with these issues currently being experienced by Burundi, Rwanda,
and DR Congo is strongly needed.
The papers of the first seminar have been published and can also
be consulted on the CREPAO
website.
The approach of the seminars aimed at being critical and introspective,
starting from precise situations, specific life experiences, specific
individuals or specific sectors to allow for a better understanding
of the general, collective and national situations in immediate
retrospective as well as in the prospective.
Scientific committee: François Constantin, Professor of
Political Science, emeritus UPPA, Daniel Bourmaud, Professor of
Political Science, UPPA, Dominique Darbon, Professor of Political
Science, CEAN Bordeaux, B. Koss, Professor of History, Université
de Laval, J.P. Chrétien, History DR emeritus, CNRS, Cemaf-Paris,
E. Morowha, Professor of History, Université du Burundi,
J. Gahama, Professor of History, Institut pédagogique du
Rwanda, D. Dibwe, Professor of History, Université de Lubumbashi,
RDC, B.Charlery de la Masselière, IFRA Nairobi
Organisation committee: Herve Maupeu,
lecturer Political Science, UPPA, Christian Thibon, Professor of
History, UPPA, Alain Cazenave-Piarrot, lecturer, IUFM/CREPAO, Julien
Nimubona, Associate Professor, UB, Joseph Gahama, , Associate Professor,
IPR
Kampala confenrece in 2007: Themes and
recommendations
The scientific reflection is organised
around four themes, inspired by the work and recommendations of
the seminar at Pau.
A reflection on scientific thought on « Humanities,
social sciences and crisis » on the contribution of social
sciences and humanities in the analysis of situations and problems
that societies of the Great Lakes region of East Africa encounter.
This is as much an epistemological reflection on the place, role,
and function of humanities and social sciences (including law, political
science, geography, history, anthropology and sociology), as a critical
outlook on the work achieved or currently underway, and a questioning
of the problems studied.
Recommendation: It is clear that a double obsession on the crisis
and identity phenomenon hinders the field of research and positioning
around scientific fields. Is a new perspective in research and teaching
desirable or achievable? The experience and debates should be presented.
The current emergence from the crisis as well as the present history
are at the heart of this articulation. There is a necessity between
the analysis of urgency and the urgency of putting in perspective
(long term and prospective).
A methodological reflection: Sources in humanities and
social sciences. The problem of sources and their confrontation,
the problem of their accessibility constitutes the basis of any
investigation and analysis and /or perspective.
Recommendation: It is necessary to continue some self-questioning
on the nature of sources, humanities and social sciences, among
other themes on large and small surveys, on internet resources as
well the use of oral sources and memory.
This methodological reflection must lead to taking into account
the need of documentation networks and their eventual connection
to information systems on a regional level that offer part of the
data indispensable for research.
A reflection on the role of scholars : « Possible
dynamics » The study of the role of scholars in
the crisis, in the exit from the crisis, in the civil society and
political life must continue, but we must avoid an exclusive critical
vision of their instrumentation or alienation of « the trial
of intellectuals » nature.
Recommendations: The papers and debates have shown “the possible
dynamics”, concerning the function and role of Universities
in situations that at first seemed blocked. It would be better to
take into account “the possible dynamics” that are gathering.
In other words, the experience, the strategies, the recomposition
as well as through inter-university cooperation at a regional level
or on a wider scale, initiatives by sector or collective initiatives
modelled on “scholar-businessmen” within the existing
institutions or territories or outside of these.
A reflection on the contribution of scholars in expertise.
This theme, dealing with expertise and research writing, measures
the distance and proximity between order-givers and other types
of expert and scholars, remains of current interest.
Recommendations: Studies and participation observation of operating
projects within this dynamic of associating scholars, other experts,
public and political decision-makers must be continued not only
to measure their limits or faults, but also their potential.
|